Brandon v. State, 654 A.2d 389 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Brandon v. State, 654 A.2d 389 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Elf v. Department of Public Health (connappct, 2001-10-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Elf v. Department of Public Health (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
The trial court in Kagan noted that the “regula tions [governing family day care facilities] . . . require . . . acquiescence in the state inspection program, including . . . consent to unannounced spot inspections.” Id., 227-28; see also Brandon v. Dept. of Human Resources, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, Docket No. 920519272 (March 26, 1993) (8 C.S.C.R. 422), aff'd, 37 Conn. App. 903 , 654 A.2d 389 (1995); Harris v. Alander, Superior Court, judicial district of Middlesex, Docket No. CV 92-0067537 (October 22, 1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shirley Brandon
v.
State of Connecticut
12520.
Connecticut Appellate Court.
Mar 14, 1995.
654 A.2d 389
Shirley Brandon, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff)., Marianne I. Horn, assistant attorney general, with whom were Judith Merrill, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Richard J. Lynch, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (state).
Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.