Steigert v. Steigert, 667 A.2d 808 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Steigert v. Steigert, 667 A.2d 808 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LOIS COPES STEIGERT
v.
FREDERICK E. STEIGERT
13612.
Connecticut Appellate Court.
Dec 12, 1995.
667 A.2d 808
Kathleen M. Harkins, for the appellant (defendant)., James R. Greenfield, with whom, on the brief, was Janet M. Degnan, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Published
PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment denying a motion to open. Counsel for the defendant on appeal was trial counsel and this appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss seriatim the defendant’s numerous claims would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).

The judgment is affirmed.