green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(2×)
See Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 942 F.2d 799 (D.C.Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CRITICAL MASS ENERGY PROJECT
v.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
v.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
No. 90-5120.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Sep 6, 1991.
Buckley, Edwards, Ginsburg, Henderson, Mikva, Randolph, Sentelle, Silberman, Thomas, Wald, Williams.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.The Suggestions For Rehearing En Banc and appellant’s response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestions. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestions are granted and this case will be considered and decided by the Court sitting en banc. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the panel filed on April 30, 1991, 931 F.2d 939 be, and the same hereby is, vacated.
A future order will govern further proceedings.