green
Positive treatment
17.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Travis Davis
See United States v. Fouse, 578 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir. 2009); Castillo, 406 F.3d at 813 ; United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917 (9th Cir. 2005).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Davis
See United States v. Fouse, 578 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir.2009); Castillo, 406 F.3d at 813 ; United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917 (9th Cir.2005).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Tucker
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Tucker seeks to distinguish United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917 (9th Cir.2005), on which the government relies.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Sanchez-Beltran
United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917 (9th Cir.2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tha Bun Heng
See United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917 (9th Cir.2005) (finding constructive possession of contraband where the defendant had exclusive control over the place where the contraband was found); United States v. Hursh, 217 F.3d 761, 767-68 (9th Cir.2000) (holding the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant knew of narcotics in his car because he was the driver and sole occupant to the car).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Hall
See United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917 (9th Cir.2005); United States v. Scott, 74 F.3d 175, 178 (9th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Packer
See United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917-18 (9th Cir.2005) (applying the modified categorical approach to Washington conviction for third degree assault by criminal negligence); see also Wash. Rev.Code § 9A.08.010(2) (providing that “[w]hen a statute provides that criminal negligence suffices to establish an element of an offense, such element is also established if a person acts intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Weicks
Accordingly, the prior guilty plea “did not constitute a crime of violence under either the categorical or the modified categorical approach, and [thus] Sandoval’s sentence was improperly enhanced.” Id.; see also United States v. Young, 420 F.3d 915, 917-18 (9th Cir.2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jacoby Lee FELIX, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Deneice A. MAYLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
v.
Deneice A. MAYLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
02-16614.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 18, 2005.
David M. Porter, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant., Mathew Chan, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Canby, Fletcher, Tallman.
Published
ORDER
The original decision entered by this court in this matter, reported at 379 F.3d 612, was reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. See Mayle v. Felix, —U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2562, 162 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005). In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court, the judgment of the district court entered on July 1, 2002, is in all respects
AFFIRMED.