No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rodrigo Alejandro MORALES-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Rodrigo Alejandro MORALES-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
05-10115.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 19, 2006.
Elizabeth A. Olson, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division/Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Rene L. Valladares, Esq., Monique N. Kirtley, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Goodwin, O'Scannlain, Tallman.
Published
ORDER
The panel opinion and Judge Tallman’s dissent filed on February 22, 2006, are withdrawn. A substitute opinion will issue in due course. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot without preju[*1157] dice to renewal by either party following issuance of the new opinion.