Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Weeks
See Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 37 (1972); State v. Cook, 125 N.H. 452, 455 , 481 A.2d 823, 825-26 (1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Lemire
It should be noted that our holding in State v. Cook, 125 N.H. 452, 460 , 481 A.2d 823, 829 (decided this day), calls attention to the fact that in appropriate circumstances, in the exercise of their discretion, trial courts may appoint counsel to an indigent defendant in habitual-offender proceedings even though there is no constitutional requirement that such be done.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Westover
I, art. 15; see State v. Cook, 125 N.H. 452, 455 , 481 A.2d 823, 825 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gagnon
Compare State v. Cook, 125 N.H. 452, 457 , 481 A.2d 823, 828 (1984) (court need not appoint counsel for indigent charged with violation) with RSA 604-A:2, I (indigents charged with misdemeanors must be given opportunity to have court-appointed counsel).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State of New Hampshire
v.
John P. Boswell
v.
John P. Boswell
No. 83-100.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
Aug 27, 1984.
Gregory H. Smith, attorney general (Loretta S. Platt, assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State., Philip R. Waystack, Jr., of Colebrook, by brief and orally, for the defendant.
Published
Memorandum Opinion
Counsel for the defendant advised the court that the State had withdrawn the habitual offender petition filed against his client.[*461] Before that withdrawal, the defendant had raised the issue of an indigent defendant’s right to appointed counsel at an habitual offender proceeding. The companion case of State v. Cook, 125 N.H. 452, 481 A.2d 823 (1984), raised the same issue, and we have ruled on it by our opinion of even date. Counsel is not entitled to payment from public funds.
Remanded.