Schuette v. Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action, 134 S. Ct. 49 (2013).

Schuette v. Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action, 134 S. Ct. 49 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

No syfertize treatment data for this case.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Bill SCHUETTE, Attorney General of Michigan
v.
COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)

No. 12–682..

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct 1, 2013.

134 S. Ct. 49

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Motion of respondents for divided argument granted, and the time is to be divided *50as follows: 15 minutes for respondents Chase Cantrell, et al. and 15 minutes for respondents Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al.

Consideration, Motions, Took.

Published

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.