green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kelly v. Caswell & Co.
See Guy v. Cincinnati Northern Railroad, 198 Mich. 140 , 166 N.W. 667 (1917), cert. denied, 246 U.S. 668 , 38 S.Ct. 336 , 62 L.Ed. 930 (1918) 1 ; Heatherly v. Tri-State Motor Exp., 304 Mich. 303 , 8 N.W.2d 75 (1943); Jenkins v. Raleigh Trucking Services, Inc., 187 Mich.App. 424 , 468 N.W.2d 64 (1991), lv. denied, 440 Mich. 862 , 486 N.W.2d 695 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Helicopters, Inc. v. San Tan Ranches
See Dent v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co., supra; Splinter v. City of Nampa, supra. However, it is also the rule *571 that “the possibility, or even probability of another cause for damages than that alleged does not defeat recovery where plaintiff presents sufficient facts to justify a reasonable juror in concluding that the thing charged was the prime and moving cause.” Stillwell v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co., 61 Idaho 357, 360 , 102 P.2d 296, 298 (1940); see Sumey v. Craig Mountain Lumber Co., 31 Idaho 234, 242 , 170 P. 112, 114 (1918), cert. denied 246 U.S. 667 , 38 S.Ct. 336 , 62 L…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frederic W. Goudy
v.
Henry Alfred Hansen, etc.
v.
Henry Alfred Hansen, etc.
No. 870.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1918.
Mr. E. W. Bradford and Mr. Charles E. Hughes for petitioner., Mr. Nathan Heard for respondent.
Published
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.