Keig v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 305 U.S. 658 (1939). · Go Syfert
Search
Keig v. Harris Trust & Sav. Bank, 305 U.S. 658 (1939). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“no doubt the debtor, because of its inability to meet its maturing obligations, acquiesced in harris' recommendations , but this we think is not sufficient to constitute domination of its will.”
34 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Westminster Bank USA v. Century Healthcare Corp. (nysd, 1995-05-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1939 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1939 1982 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National Westminster Bank USA v. Century Healthcare Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
no doubt the debtor, because of its inability to meet its maturing obligations, acquiesced in harris' recommendations , but this we think is not sufficient to constitute domination of its will.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keig, Trustee in Bankruptcy
v.
Harris Trust & Savings Bank Same v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank and Same v. First National Bank
No. 483; No. 484; No. 485.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 3, 1939.
305 U.S. 658
Messrs. William W. Wilson and Edmund D. Adcock for petitioners., Messrs. Charles LeRoy Brown and Jacob Logan Fox for Harris Trust & Savings Bank, and Messrs. Francis X. Busch, Harold V. Amberg, James J. Magner, and Cassius M. Doty for First National Bank, respondents.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Reported below: 98 F. 2d 952.