United States v. Moscow Fire Ins., 309 U.S. 624 (1940). · Go Syfert
United States v. Moscow Fire Ins., 309 U.S. 624 (1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In The Matter Of Israel-British Bank (London) Limited (ca2, 1976-05-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1940 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1940 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." In The Matter Of Israel-British Bank (London) Limited
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Moscow Fire Insurance Co. v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 280 N.Y. 286, 299 , 20 N.E.2d 758 (1939), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 309 U.S. 624 , 60 S.Ct. 725 , 84 L.Ed. 986 (1940).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Israel-British Bank (London) Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Moscow Fire Insurance Co. v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 280 N.Y. 286, 299 , 20 N.E.2d 758 (1939), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 309 U.S. 624 , 60 S.Ct. 725 , 84 L.Ed. 986 (1940).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Roca Bacó v. Thomson
prsupreme · 1954 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Publicker v. Shallcross, 106 F. 2d 949 , cert. denied, 309 U. S. 624, and Cowan v. Cowan, 166 P. 2d 21 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Moscow Fire Insurance Co.
No. 355.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 12, 1940.
309 U.S. 624
Mr. Edward J. Ennis, with whom Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Shed, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney, Frederick Bernays Wiener, and Aaron B. Holman were on the brief, for the United States., Mr. Paul C. Whipp, with whom Mr. Lounsbury D.'Bates was on the brief, for Lucke, Surviving Director of Moscow Fire Ins. Co.; Mr. Borris M. Komar for Morro et al.; Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel for Kentman et al.; Mr. Hart-well Cabell for Heckscher et al.; Mr. Walter H. Poliak for Zahle et al.; Mr. Samson Selig submitted for Sawyer et al.; and Mr. Thomas Kieman submitted for Hoppe, Executor; — respondents., By leave of Court Mr. Frederick H. Wood filed a brief on behalf of Steingut et al., Receivers, as amici curiae, urging affirmance.
Consideration, Reed, Stone, Took.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Stone, Me. Justice Reed, and Mr. Justice Muephy took no part in the consideration or decision of this cause.