green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc. v. United States
See Carolina Scenic Coach Lines v. United States, 56 F.Supp. 801 (W.D.N.C.1944), aff’d 323 U.S. 678 , 65 S.Ct. 277 , 89 L.Ed. 550 (1944), and North Coast Transportation Co. v. United States, 54 F.Supp. 448 (N.D.Cal.1944), aff’d 323 U.S. 668 , 65 S.Ct. 62 , 89 L.Ed. 543 (1944), reh. den. 323 U.S. 814 , 65 S.Ct. 114 , 89 L.Ed. 647 (1944).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez
Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (C.C.A. 7, 1928); see United States v. Johnson, 142 F.2d 588, 591 (C.C.A.7), petition for cert. dismissed 823 U.S. 806 , 65 S.Ct. 264 , 89 L.Ed. 643 (1944); United States v. Hiss, 107 F. Supp. 128, 136 (S.D.N.Y.1952); aff’d 2 Cir., 201 F.2d 372 , cert. denied 345 U.S. 942 , 73 S.Ct. 830 , 97 L.Ed. 1368 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Sunrise Lumber & Trim Corp.
It is well settled that “newly discovered evi- *626 denee, the effect of which is merely to discredit, contradict or impeach a witness does not afford a basis for -the granting of a new trial.” Davis v. Yellow Cab Co., 5 Cir., 1955, 220 F.2d 790, 792 ; see United States v. Johnson, 7 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 588, 592 , certiorari dismissed, 323 U.S. 806 , 65 S.Ct. 264 , 89 L.Ed. 643 ; United States v. Rutkin, 3 Cir., 1953, 208 F.2d 647, 654 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marshall v. State
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Johnson (7th Cir.) 142 F.2d 588, 591, 592 , cert. dismd., 323 U.S. 806 , 65 S.Ct. 264 , 89 L.Ed. 643 ; United States v. Hiss (D.C.N.Y.) 107 F.Supp. 128, 136 , affd. (2 Cir.) 201 F.2d 372 . 352 U.S. at 12, n. 6 , 77 S.Ct. at 7 , 1 L.Ed.2d at 8-9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stanley B. Robinson, Stanley B. Robinson v. United States
(2×)
See also United States v. Johnson, 142 F.2d 588 (7th Cir.), Appeal dismissed, 323 U.S. 806 , 65 S.Ct. 264 , 89 L.Ed. 643 (1944) 5 As this court previously recognized: Relief is available under § 2255 only if the petitioner demonstrates that the error of the trial court is jurisdictional or constitutional, or an error of law which is "a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice" and which presents "exceptional circumstances where the need for the remedy afforded by the writ of Habeas corpus is apparent." (Davis v. United States, 417 U.S. 333, 346 , 94 S.C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex parte James Preston Bratcher Ex parte Willie Mat Maxson McKee Lynn
v.
Ulio, Adjutant General
v.
Ulio, Adjutant General
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1944.
Published
The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.