Baker v. Hunter, 323 U.S. 740 (1944). · Go Syfert
Baker v. Hunter, 323 U.S. 740 (1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“ejvery court of superior jurisdiction has the inherent power to compel obedience to its decrees and to punish those who obstruct or degrade the administration of justice”
24 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rental Property Management Services v. Hatcher (mass, 2018-05-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1944 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1944 1985 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Rental Property Management Services v. Hatcher
Mass. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
every court of superior jurisdiction has the inherent power ... to punish those who obstruct or degrade the administration of 333 justice
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Brogan (2×)
Mass. · 1993 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
ejvery court of superior jurisdiction has the inherent power to compel obedience to its decrees and to punish those who obstruct or degrade the administration of justice
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The PATRIOT GROUP, LLC v. STEVEN C. FUSTOLO & Others.
Mass. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also New England Novelty Co. v. Sandberg, 315 Mass. 739, 746 , cert. denied, 323 U.S. 740 (1944) (judge has power to compel obedience to his decrees and punish those who obstruct or degrade administration of justice).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baker
v.
Hunter, Warden
No. 151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1944.
323 U.S. 740
Messrs. A. G. Bush and James J. Laughlin for petitioner., Solicitor General Fahy for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
3 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #35,579 of 633,719
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (3)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied for the reason that the case is moot.