green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Eaton Corp., Etc. v. Ss Galeona
See Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. THE CAMPFIRE, 156 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 774 , 67 S.Ct. 194 , 91 L.Ed. 666 (1946).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanover Insurance Company v. Shulman Transport Enterprises, Inc.
See Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. The Campfire, 156 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Pan-American Trade & Credit Corp., 329 U.S. 774 , 67 S.Ct. 194 , 91 L.Ed. 666 (1946).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.
The most significant of these were: (1) when goods were received by the carrier in sound condition but were delivered damaged, the burden of proof was placed on the carrier to show how the damage occurred and that the carrier was not responsible therefor; (2) owners of goods were allowed adequate time within which to file claims against the carriers where damage occurred; and (3) the carriers were to accept greater liability for damages per package without a corresponding increase in freight rates. 3 Hearings, supra at 18; see Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. The Campfire, 156 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.
The most significant of these were: (1) when goods were received by the carrier in sound condition but were delivered damaged, the burden of proof was placed on the carrier to show how the damage occurred and that the carrier was not responsible therefor; (2) owners of goods were allowed adequate time within which to file claims against the carriers where damage occurred; and (3) the carriers were to accept greater liability for damages per package without a corresponding increase in freight rates. 3 Hearings, supra at 18; see Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. The Campfire, 156 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Standard Electrica, S.A. v. Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft, Defendant-Appellee,and Columbus Lines, Inc.
(2×)
See Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. The Campfire, 156 F.2d 603, 605-606 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 329 U.S. 774 , 67 S.Ct. 194 , 91 L.Ed. 666 (1946).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hines
v.
Nierstheimer, Warden
v.
Nierstheimer, Warden
No. 618.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 1946.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.