discussed Cited "see" Miller v. Mecklenburg County See United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174 (4th Cir.1981), Morton v. Welch, 162 F.2d 840 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 779 (1947). 16 Even assuming that appellant has not waived her right to object to the selection of the jury, we see no basis for concluding that the jury in this instance was not "fair and impartial." No effort has been made in this appeal to establish any actual bias or partiality by the juror in dispute.

discussed Cited "see" Wayne Goham v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex, Dennis Tyndall v. Charles L. Wolff, Jr., Warden, Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex From other opinions of that court it appears that it does not usually entertain original petitions for habeas corpus, but remits the petitioner to an application to the appropriate district court of the state, from whose decision an appeal lies to the state Supreme Court, Williams v. Olson, 143 Neb. 115 , 8 N.W. 2d 830, 831 ; see In re White, 33 Neb. 812, 814-815 , 51 N.W. 287 . . . . 10 "Of this remedy in the state court petitioner has not availed himself." 11 See also Hawk v. Olson, 66 F.Supp. 195, 197 (D.Neb.1946), aff'd 160 F.2d 807 (8 Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 779 , 68 S.Ct. 44 ,…