King v. Priest, 333 U.S. 852 (1948).

King v. Priest, 333 U.S. 852 (1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.6 score

16 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 16

Treatment by court

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

King
v.
Priest

No. 630.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Mar 15, 1948.

333 U.S. 852

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

S. D. Flanagan and E. D. Franey for appellants., J. C. Taylor, Attorney General of Missouri, for appellees.

Are, Douglas, Noted, Should.

Published

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.