green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.8 score
“klapprott”
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
SER The First State Bank v. Hon. F. Jane Hustead, Judge
See generally Int’l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 556 F.2d 665, 670-71 (2d Cir.1977) (‘While any motion under Rule 60(b) is addressed to the discretion of the trial court ... this discretion is especially broad under subdivision (6), because relief under it is to be granted when ‘appropriate to accomplish justice,’ Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (plurality opinion of Black, J.), modified on other grounds, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); see 11 C.
cited
Cited "see"
Henriquez v. Astrue
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-15 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); Cotto v. United States, 993 F.2d 274, 277-78 (1st Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Muccino
“This catch-all clause in Rule 60 gives the district court a ‘grand reservoir [of] equitable power to do justice in a particular case.’ ” Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., 318 F.2d 538, 542 (2d Cir.1963) (quoting 7 Moore, Federal Practice (1950 ed.) at 308 and citing Pierre v. Bernuth, Lembcke Co., 20 F.R.D. 116, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1956)); accord Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-615 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949) (plurality opinion) (“In simple English, the language of the ‘other reason’ clause, for all reasons except the five particularly specified, ve…
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. American Overseas Marine Corp.
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614-15 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949) (noting that Rule 60(b)(6) provides courts the authority “adequate to enable them to vacate judgments whenever such action is appropriate to accomplish justice”); Harrell v. DCS Equip.
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. Virginia Lee Co.
See generally Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 613-15 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Meza-Soria
See Kungys v. United States, 485 U.S. 759, 792-95 , 108 S.Ct. 1537, 1557-59 , 99 L.Ed.2d 839 (1988) (Stevens, J., concurring), and Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 612-13 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 389 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949) (Black, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 613 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 389-90 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); Profitt, supra, 513 A.2d at 218 (citing Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Hill, 250 A.2d 923, 925 (D.C.1969); Union Storage Co. v. Knight, 400 A.2d 316, 318 (D.C.1979); Ohio Valley Constr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Suerth v. Mapson (In Re Mapson)
See Klapprott v. U.S., 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949), modified 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); U.S. v. Baus, 834 F.2d 1114, 1121-22 (1st Cir.1987); United States v. Karahalias, 205 F.2d 331, 333 (2d Cir.1953). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Randall v. Lynch
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 614 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
Midway Oil Corp. v. Guess
(2×)
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , judgment modified by 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); Compton v. Alton Steamship Co., supra; Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc., Wyo., 639 P.2d 1385 (1982); Westring v. Cheyenne National Bank, Wyo., 393 P.2d 119 (1964); Lake v. Lake, 63 Wyo. 375 , 182 P.2d 824 (1947); Giles v. Giles, Ala., 404 So.2d 649 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 290, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,484 John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., William E. Fitzgerald, Benedict Martorana and Alex E. Penman, Movants-Appellants
See Klapprott v. United States, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949). 41 My quarrel with the majority may be summarized briefly.
cited
Cited "see"
Dunlop v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See Klapprott v. United States, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
cited
Cited "see"
Cockerham v. Zikratch
Accord, Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mervin C. McKinney v. Joseph Boyle
See Klapprott v. United States, 1949, 335 U.S. 601, 613-615 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 ; Cavalliotis v. Salomon, 2 Cir., 1966, 357 F.2d 157, 159 ; L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/s
See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 398 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); United States v. Karahalias, 205 F.2d 331 (2d Cir. 1953); Kathe v. United States, 284 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1960); Davis v. Wadsworth Construction Co., 27 F.R.D. 1 (E.D.Pa.1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beckwith v. Klein
See Woods v. Durr, 3 Cir., 170 F.2d 976 , judgment vacated and remanded, 336 U.S. 941 , 69 S.Ct. 809 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 , now opinion, 3 Cir., 176 F.2d 273 ; Woods v. Gorman, 7 Cir., 179 F.2d 290 ; Taylor v. Bowles, Em.App., 145 F.2d 833 ; Wilson v. Brown, Em.App., 137 F.2d 348 ; Woods v. Palumbo, D.C., M.D., Pa., 79 F.Supp. 998 ; Woods v. Taper, D.C., S.D., Cal., 79 F.Supp. 984 ; Woods v. Cammett, D.C., N.H., 80 F.Supp. 636 ; Sabbow v. Humiston, 193 Misc. 81 , 83 N.Y.S.2d 359 ; Sinclair v. Byrne, 193 Misc. 1 , 83 N.Y.S.2d 629 . .House of Representatives, Hearings before the Committee on the Dist…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Austin v. Donahoe
See, e.g., Norris v. Salazar, 277 F.R.D. 22, 24, 26-28 (D.D.C.2011) (relief under Rule 60(b)(6) granted where plaintiffs case was dismissed due to counsel’s neglect, and where plaintiff filed motion for relief three months after learning of dismissal); see also More v. Lew, 34 F.Supp.3d at 30 (“A delay of several years, like that in this case, has only been found reasonable when plaintiff bore no fault for the delay and filed a motion as soon as feasible.”) (citing Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacEwen Petroleum, Inc. v. Tarbell
Sony Corp. v. Elm State Elec., Inc., 800 F.2d 317, 320 (2d Cir.1986); Enron, 10 F.3d at 96 ; Meehan, 652 F.2d at 277 ; See also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390-91 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949), modified, 335 U.S. 631 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryan v. Butler
Sony Corp. v. Elm State Elec., Inc., 800 F.2d 317, 320 (2d Cir.1986); Enron, 10 F.3d at 96 ; Meehan, 652 F.2d at 277 ; See also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 615 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 390-91 , 93 L.Ed. 266 (1949), modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James M. Patton and Joann Patton, Legal Guardians for Thomas Edward Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
As a remedial provision, Rule 60(b) is to be “liberally construed for the purpose of doing substantial justice.” 7 Moore, supra, ¶¶ 60.18[8], 60.19; see also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 609 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 387 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Favell v. United States
See, e.g., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 611 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 388 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); King v. United States, 31 Ct.Cl. 304, 305-306 (1896); Marziliano v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 151 (2nd Cir.1984); See also, 10 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell
See also Klapprott, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (due process); Collins v. Foreman, 729 F.2d 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870 , 105 S.Ct. 218 , 83 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984) (subject matter jurisdiction); Martocci, No. 84-1025, slip op.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Piambino v. Bailey
See, e.g., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949) (citizenship may not be revoked by default judgment); Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 710-11 (7th Cir.1979) (court requires that trial briefs henceforth be exchanged before rather than after trial to avoid prejudicing the parties), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Piambino v. Bailey
See, e.g., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949) (citizenship may not be revoked by default judgment); Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704, 710-11 (7th Cir.1979) (court requires that trial briefs henceforth be exchanged before rather than after trial to avoid prejudicing the parties), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1278 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ater v. United States
See, e.g., Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601, 611 , 69 S.Ct. 384, 388 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 (1949); King v. United States, 31 Ct.Cl. 304, 305-306 (1896); Marziliano v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 151 (2nd Cir.1984); See also, 10 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.
See also Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , as modified, 336 U.S. 942 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 1099 . 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woods, Housing Expediter
v.
Durr
v.
Durr
No. 476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1949.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner. J. H. Thayer Martin for respondent.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of International Trade (2)
Per Curiam:
The motion of the Solicitor General for remand of this case is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for consideration of the effect of § 209 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 193, 200, as amended by § 206 of the Act of March 30, 1949, 63 Stat. 18, 29, and the eviction regulations of the Housing Expediter issued pursuant thereto, 14 Fed. Reg. 1571.