discussed Cited "see" Jewell v. Division of Social Services See Klapprott v. United States, 335 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , 336 U.S. 949 , 69 S.Ct. 877 , 93 L.Ed. 1105 (1949); Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 , 71 S.Ct. 209 , 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950); and ARO Corp. v. Allied Witan Co., 65 F.R.D. 513 (1975), aff’d, 6 Cir., 531 F.2d 1368 (1976) (judgment based on Stipulation of settlement—vacated as being “in the interest of justice” by reason of non-moving party’s disregard and attempted repudiation of the terms of settlement). ( 531 F.2d 1368, 1371 ) We adopt as the standard for a Rule 60(b)(6) motion the “extraordinary circ…

cited Cited "see, e.g." Klein v. Rappaport See also Klapprott v. United States, 336 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 384 , 93 L.Ed. 266 , modified, 336 U.S. 949 , 69 S.Ct. 877 , 93 L.Ed. 1105 . 3 .