Land O'Lakes Dairy Co. v. Cnty. of Wadena, 338 U.S. 897 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
Land O'Lakes Dairy Co. v. Cnty. of Wadena, 338 U.S. 897 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANY (minn, 1967-09-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949 1987 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANY
Minn. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena, 229 Minn. 263 , 39 N. W. (2d) 164 , affirmed, 338 U. S. 897 , 70 S. Ct. 251 , 94 L. ed. 552, rehearing denied, 338 U. S. 945 , 70 S. Ct. 428 , 94 L. ed. 583; In re P. T.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sharpnack (2×)
SCOTUS · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc., 338 U. S. 897 , reversing, per curiam, 84 F. Supp. 660 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carroll v. Finch
D. Alaska · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Woods v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc., 84 F.Supp. 660 (D.Ill. 1949), reversed 338 U.S. 897 , 70 S.Ct. 248 , 94 L.Ed. 551 ; Nilva v. United States, 212 F.2d 115, 118 (8th Cir. 1954), upholding provision for state exemption from the Johnson Act. 5 In conclusion, a congressional determination that AFDC-UP should be inapplicable in states with unemployment problems characteristic to Alaska would be rationally related to the purposes of the legislation to help “parents or relatives to attain or retain maximum capability for the maximum self-support and personal independence con…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Land O'Lakes Dairy Co.
v.
County of Wadena
No. 447.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1949.
338 U.S. 897
Michael J. Doherty and Harold Jordan for appellant. J. A. A. Burnquist, Attorney General of Minnesota, Geo. B. Sjoselius, Deputy Attorney General, and Chas. P. Stone, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. S. R. A., Inc. v. Minnesota, 327 U. S. 558; Oklahoma Tax Comm’n v. Texas Co., 336 U. S. 342.