green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“where the parties have assented to all the terms of the contract ... the mere reference in conjunction therewith to a future contract in writing will not negative the existence of a present contract”
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fox Grocery Co. v. Mineral Labs, Inc.
where the parties have assented to all the terms of the contract ... the mere reference in conjunction therewith to a future contract in writing will not negative the existence of a present contract
cited
Cited "see"
Eugene Joseph Theriot, Cross v. Bay Drilling Corporation, Defendant-Third Party Cross and Oilfield Services of Louisiana, Inc., Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Intervenor-Appellee v. Houston Oil & Minerals Corporation, Third Party
See United States v. Arrow Stevedoring Co., 175 F.2d 329, 331 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 904 , 70 S.Ct. 307 , 94 L.Ed. 557 (1949) (following a sole proximate cause standard).
cited
Cited "see"
Theriot v. Bay Drilling Corp.
See United States v. Arrow Stevedoring Co., 175 F.2d 329, 331 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 904 , 70 S.Ct. 307 , 94 L.Ed. 557 (1949) (following a sole proximate cause standard).
cited
Cited "see"
Amerocean Steamship Co. v. Copp
See our opinion in United States v. Arrow Stevedoring Co., 9 Cir., 175 F.2d 329 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 904 , 70 S.Ct. 307 , 94 L.Ed. 557 ; Raskin v. Victory Carriers, D.C., 124 F.Supp. 879 . .
cited
Cited "see"
Fagan v. Timmons
See Fagan v. Timmons, 215 S. C. 116, 54 S. E. (2d) 536 , certiorari denied, Timmons v. Fagan, 338 U. S. 904 , 70 S. Ct. 306 , 94 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Watling v. Watling
See also Heyman v Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 176 F2d 389 (CA 2, 1949), cert den 338 US 904 ; 70 S Ct 306 ; 94 L Ed 557 (1949).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lo Bue v. United States
See also U.S. v Arrow Stevedoring Co., 9 Cir., 175 F.2d 329, 332 , certiorari denied 338 U.S. 904 , 70 S.Ct. 307 . 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arrow Stevedoring Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
Nos. 441 and 442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 19, 1949.
Lyman Henry for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison and Paul A. Sweeney for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
[*904] C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.