No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Arthur HEALD, Esq.
No. 01-264.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
Jan 18, 2002.
Published
Respondent Arthur Heald appeals from the recommendation of a hearing panel of the Professional Responsibility Board to suspend him from the practice of law for sixty days. Disciplinary counsel and respondent have submitted a. stipulation in which respondent agrees to a public reprimand and to pay Laurence Lewin the sum of $1500 as reimbursement for legal fees and costs. In accordance with the stipulation, therefore, we reverse.
Arthur Heald is hereby publicly reprimanded, for violations of Rule 1.3, 1.4(a), and 8.4(d) of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct.