Fink v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 778 N.W.2d 240 (Mich. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Fink v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 778 N.W.2d 240 (Mich. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …make additional findings regarding good cause and consent pursuant to mcr 6.006(c). at p. 1106 ⚠ not in text
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Buie
Mich. Ct. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
In People v Buie, 485 Mich 1105, 1105-1106 (2010) , our Supreme Court ordered that, in addition to the above determination, the trial court was required to make findings regarding good cause and consent to the video-conferencing procedure pursuant to MCR 6.006(C).
examined Cited as authority (rule) People v. Buie (6×)
Mich. · 2012 · confidence medium
This Court denied both applications for leave to appeal but instructed the trial court to “make [additional] findings regarding good cause and consent pursuant to MCR 6.006(C).” People v Buie, 485 Mich 1105, 1106 (2010).
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Buie
Mich. Ct. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
People v Buie, 485 Mich 1105, 1106 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John FINK, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
139965.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Feb 26, 2010.
778 N.W.2d 240
Published

Order

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.