State v. Knox, 957 P.2d 1209 (Or. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Knox, 957 P.2d 1209 (Or. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Steffens (orctapp, 2012-06-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Steffens
Or. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Knox, 134 Or App 154, 159 , 894 P2d 1185 (1995), vac’d on other grounds, 327 Or 27 , 957 P2d 1209 (1998) (where the defendant had never threatened or been violent with police and “was not acting in any unusually angry or strange manner,” officer-safety concerns did not justify search of the defendant’s truck even though the officer knew that the defendant had previously been investigated for drug offenses and homicide and knew that the defendant had a reputation for carrying weapons (internal quotation marks omitted)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bridgeman (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare State v. Knox, 134 Or App 154 , 894 P2d 1185 (1995), vac’d on other grounds 327 Or 97 , 957 P2d 1209 (1998) (officer’s concern that suspect standing outside of truck that had its windows rolled down “might have access to weapons in the interior by reaching through the window” did not justify search of vehicle on officer safety grounds). 7 In sum, this was not a situation in which “the potential for danger was great” and “the need for all safety precautions was paramount.” Rickard, 150 Or App at 527 (emphasis in original). 8 The search of the car was unlawful.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
James Kenji KNOX, Petitioner on Review.
S42301.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Apr 23, 1998.
957 P.2d 1209
Carson, C.J., and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham and Leeson.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

[*1210] Kathryn A. Wood, Corvallis, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

No appearance contra.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, Van HOOMISSEN, DURHAM and LEESON, JJ.[**]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals in light of State v. Morton, 326 Or. 466, 953 P.2d 374 (1998).

[**] Graber, J., resigned March 31, 1998, and did not participate in the decision of this case; Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.