green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
17.7 score
“the zoning board of appeals did not have jurisdiction to decide the plaintiff's substantive due process and takings claims.”
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Karen Connell v. Lima Township
the zoning board of appeals did not have jurisdiction to decide the plaintiff's substantive due process and takings claims.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Joseph Stanislaw v. Thetford Twp., Mich.
But in Houdini, the circuit court similarly purported to “rule[] on the plaintiff’s taking[s] claim” in affirming the ZBA’s decision. 743 N.W.2d at 200 (Corrigan, J., dissenting).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Jon Jon's Inc. v. City of Warren
(4×)
Id. at 199 (Corrigan, J., dissenting). 1 The plaintiff challenged the designation before the ZBA, which denied his application for a variance.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Get Back Up, Inc. v. City of Detroit
(7×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 199 (Corrigan, J. dissenting). 9 The zoning board denied the variance and the plaintiff appealed that decision to the Wayne County Circuit Court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Beatrice Shanel COLLIER and Markia Raja Miller, Minors. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Cordellia Miller, a/k/a Cordellia Collier, Respondent-Appellant.
v.
Cordellia Miller, a/k/a Cordellia Collier, Respondent-Appellant.
135552.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Jan 18, 2008.
Published
Citer courts: Michigan Court of Appeals (1)
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.