green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herberto Pulgar
See United States v. Brown, 726 F.3d 993, 1002 (7th Cir.2013) (observing “multiple, large-quantity purchases on credit” are considered “sufficient proof’ of conspiracy), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 911 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valspar Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
See InterDigital Commc'ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 718 F.3d 1336, 1346-47 (Fed.Cir.2013) (“wholly groundless” inquiry asks only if there exists a "plausible argument” that the arbitration clause applies to the dispute), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
See, e.g., Simmons v. Sabine River Authority, La., 732 F.3d 469, 476-77 (5th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1876 (2014) (concluding that “FERC, not state tort law, must set the appropriate duty of care for dam operators” and reasoning that “[a]pplying state tort law to set the duty of care for the operation of FERC-licensed projects would ‘stand[ ] as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives’ of the FPA”); Carrington v. City of Tacoma, Dep’t of Pub.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Azar v. Garza
See, e.g., LG Electronics, Inc. v. InterDigital Communications, LLC, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondents withdrew the complaint they filed with the International Trade Commission); United States v. Samish Indian Nation, 568 U.S. 936 , 133 S.Ct. 423 , 184 L.Ed.2d 253 (2012) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondent voluntarily dismissed its claim in the Court of Federal Claims); Eisai Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 564 U.S. 1001 , 131 S.Ct. 2991 , 180 L.Ed.2d 818 (2011) (before the certiorari petition wa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
v.
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
v.
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
No. 13–796..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2014.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Case below, 718 F.3d 1336.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).