green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nivis Martin
See United States v. Stargell, 738 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.2013) (“The increased risk of loss presented by fraudulent terms is sufficient to ‘affect’ a financial institution [in the context of wire fraud].”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2289 , 189 L.Ed.2d 178 (2014); United States v. Serpico, 320 F.3d 691, 694-95 (7th Cir.2003) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waste Management of Louisiana v. River Birch, Inco
Co ., 319 F.3d 225 , 228 (5th Cir. 2003) (applying general Rule 56 summary judgment standard in RICO case). 56 Tolan v. Cotton , 572 U.S. 650 , 656, 134 S.Ct. 1861 , 188 L.Ed.2d 895 (2014) (per curiam) (summarily reversing our entry of summary judgment emphasizing "a 'judge's function' at summary judgment is not 'to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial.' ") (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. , 477 U.S. 242 , 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) ); see also, e.g. , Thomas v. Nugent , 572 U.S. 1111 , 134 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FOREVER 21, INC., and Skiz Imports LLC
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 13–822..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 2014.
Published
Case below, 718 F.3d 1370.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.