In re McMeen, 137 S. Ct. 21 (2016). · Go Syfert
In re McMeen, 137 S. Ct. 21 (2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MacMillan v. City and County of San Francisco (cand, 2022-05-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MacMillan v. City and County of San Francisco
N.D. Cal. · 2022 · confidence medium
Id. (citing Pearson, 555 U.S. at 235 ). 19 Regarding the second prong, “clearly established law should not be defined at a high level of 20 generality,” but instead “must be particularized to the facts of the case.” White v. Pauly, 137 S. Ct. 21 548, 552 (2017) (cleaned up).
discussed Cited "see" Joshua A. Gray v. Department of Public Safety
Me. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
The Department’s application of the statutes was, therefore, narrowly tailored to serve the significant governmental interest in maintaining standards for licensing professional investigators, who are responsible for researching and reporting on some of the most consequential details of people’s lives by investigating “[t]he identity, habits, conduct, movements, whereabouts, affiliations, associations, transactions, reputation or character” of others. 32 M.R.S. § 8103(4-A)(A), (B); see Packingham, 137 S. Ct. 21 at 1736.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Herbert Edgar McMEEN.
No. D–2881..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 8, 2016.
137 S. Ct. 21
Published

In the Matter of DISBARMENT OF Herbert Edgar McMEEN.

Disbarment order entered.