Cathey v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 2116 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Cathey v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 2116 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Rafael Ortega (ca5, 2017-08-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rafael Ortega
5th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
“It is well-established in this Circuit that a disjunctive statute may be pleaded conjunctively and proved disjunctively.” 2 United States v. Haymes, 610 F.2d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 1980) (per curiam); see also United States v. Holley, 831 F.3d 322 , 328 & n.14 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 2118 , 198 L.Ed.2d 203 (2017).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shawn Travis CATHEY
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16–7545..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 2017.
137 S. Ct. 2116
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.