West v. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. of Michigan, 725 N.W.2d 671 (Mich. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
West v. Farm Bureau Gen. Ins. Co. of Michigan, 725 N.W.2d 671 (Mich. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“generally, to preserve this issue for appellate review, a motion to disqualify must be filed within 14 days after the moving party discovers the basis for disqualification . . . .”
107 citation events (107 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People of Michigan v. Lawrence Gerard Nassar (michctapp, 2020-12-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) People of Michigan v. Lawrence Gerard Nassar
Mich. Ct. App. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
generally, to preserve this issue for appellate review, a motion to disqualify must be filed within 14 days after the moving party discovers the basis for disqualification . . . .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Marks v. Schafer and Weiner, PLLC
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · confidence medium
Statute of Limitations Under Michigan law, “[a] legal malpractice claim must be brought within two years of the date the claim accrues, or within six months after the plaintiff discovers or should have discovered the existence of the claim, whichever is later.” Kloian v. Schwartz, 725 N.W.2d 671, 675 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006) (citing Mich. Comp.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Welch v. Dobias
W.D. Mich. · 2019 · confidence medium
“A legal malpractice claim must be brought within two years of the date the claim accrues, or within six months after the plaintiff discovers or should have discovered the existence of the claim, whichever is later.” Kloian v. Schwartz, 272 Mich. App. 232, 237 , 725 N.W.2d 671, 675 (2006) (citing M.C.L. §§ 600.5805(6) and 600.5838).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. Smith
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
Id. at 107 ; see, e.g., Kloian v. Schwartz, 725 N.W.2d 671, 675 (Mich. App. 2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jane Campbell WEST and Joe Eldon West, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, a Michigan Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
132156.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Jan 24, 2007.
725 N.W.2d 671
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 70%
Citer courts: Michigan Court of Appeals (1)

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of McDonald v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co (Docket No. 132218) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.