neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roseanne DAVIDSON and John Davidson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY, L.L.C., DaimlerChrysler Corporation, and DaimlerChrysler Canada, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY, L.L.C., DaimlerChrysler Corporation, and DaimlerChrysler Canada, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
126556.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Sep 26, 2006.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
By order of June 10, 2005, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in Radeljak v.[*577] DaimlerChrysler Corp (Docket No. 127679). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 19, 2006, 475 Mich. 598, 719 N.W.2d 40 (2006), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reconsideration of the motion for dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds in light of Radeljak.
We do not retain jurisdiction.