green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Howell v. Cardinal Industries, Inc.
This court looks to whether the activity which resulted in the injury is one in which an employee might reasonably be expected to engage or has been impliedly authorized to perform, Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps, 90 S.D. 443, 447 , 241 N.W.2d 868, 870 (1976); Krier, 78 S.D. at 119 , 98 N.W.2d at 487 , or “if what he is doing is naturally related or incidental to his employment, ...” Krier, 78 S.D. at 119 , 98 *712 N.W.2d at 487; Lang, 70 S.D. at 347 , 17 N.W.2d at 697 , or if he is doing what “he is expressly or impliedly authorized to do by the contract or nature of the employment.�…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Charles WARD, Defendant-Appellant.
v.
Michael Charles WARD, Defendant-Appellant.
130255.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Apr 28, 2006.
Published
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of February 27, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.