Scalise v. Boy Scouts of Am., 713 N.W.2d 252 (Mich. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Scalise v. Boy Scouts of Am., 713 N.W.2d 252 (Mich. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John E. SCALISE, Individually and as Parent, Guardian, and Next Friend of Benjamin Scalise, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA and Mt. Pleasant Public Schools, Defendants-Appellees.
128085.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Feb 27, 2006.
713 N.W.2d 252
Michael F. Cavanagh and Marilyn J. Kelly.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of July 8, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

MARKMAN, J., recuses himself from this case on the basis of the nature of his current participation with the defendant organization.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.

[*253] WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:

I do not participate in deciding plaintiff's motion to reconsider the denial of plaintiff's motion to disqualify Chief Justice Taylor. As I stated in my dissent to the order entered in this matter on July 8, 2005, I oppose the entry of any order in this case at this time until this Court addresses, resolves, and makes clear for all to know the proper procedures for handling motions for the recusal of Supreme Court justices from participation in a case. See Scalise v. Boy Scouts of America, 473 Mich. 853, 700 N.W.2d 360 (2005). For that reason, I do not decide or address the merits of the motion for reconsideration of the Court's denial of plaintiff's application for leave to appeal.