People v. Taylor, 706 N.W.2d 730 (Mich. 2005). · Go Syfert
People v. Taylor, 706 N.W.2d 730 (Mich. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Taylor v. McKee (ca6, 2011-08-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Taylor v. McKee (2×)
6th Cir. · 2011 · confidence medium
The supreme court denied Taylor’s application for leave to appeal, stating that it was “not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by [that] Court.” People v. Taylor, 474 Mich. 970 , 706 N.W.2d 730, 730 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of The State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sean Stephen TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.
128255.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Dec 16, 2005.
706 N.W.2d 730
Marilyn J. Kelly.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant leave to appeal. The Court of Appeals decision in this case grafts onto the felony-murder statute offenses that the Legislature did not list there. M.C.L. § 750.316. We should review this decision to ensure that it is not a judicial expansion into an area that the[*731] Legislature has clearly occupied. Hence, I would grant leave to appeal.