G Cite
cited 6× by 6 distinct cases, 2020–2021 ·
…can prove 17 facts that it has not alleged or that the defendants have violated the . . . laws in ways that have not 18 been alleged.
at p. 526
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1901 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1901
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Araujo v. Coachella Valley Water District
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sanz v. City of Vallejo
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Travis v. Monnier
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
King v. C&K Market, Inc.
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Zurich American Ins. Co. of Illinois v. VForce Inc.
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mountjoy v. Bank of America, N.A.
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Spine & Neurosurgery Associates v. United Healthcare Ins. Co.
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Mtula Tashamby Payton v. Sacramento County
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Zhang v. CA Dept. of State Hospitals
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Smith v. CALPIA
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Forgan v. Tuolumne County Jail
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Bejarano v. Lynch
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Gradford v. Warden
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Hill v. Engelbrektson
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Northcutt v. Sacramento Sheriff's Dept.
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Zhang v. CA Dept. of State Hospitals
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Brannigan v. Rhea
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Smith v. Uzma
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Bejarano v. Lynch
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Singh v. CDCR
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Robertson v. Gutierrez
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Hill v. Engelbrektson
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Venable v. Tally
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Brackett v. Anderson
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Peterson v. Leekie
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Smith v. Calpia
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Edwards v. Corter
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Taylor v. Cameron
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Brookshire v. Sacramento County Main Jail
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Khademi v. Newsome
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Stanford v. Stashyn
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Barkacs v. Bharat
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PS) Bledsoe v. Zuckerberg
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Luna v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept.
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Wheaton v. McComber
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Cyrus v. Covello
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) O'Brien v. Timms
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Hood v. Rosen
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Garner v. Hill
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Henderson v. CDCR
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Brown v. Sergent
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Nitkin v. Radu
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Barkacs v. Bharat
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spring Et Al.
v.
the South Carolina Insurance Company
v.
the South Carolina Insurance Company
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 15, 1821.
Mr. Hunt, for the respondents,, Mr. Wheaton, for: the appellants,
Cited by 121 opinions | Published
The Court
denied the motion, but stated that as the object of the respondents was to have the proceeds of the property in litigation, which had been sold by order of the Court below, invested in stocks, such investment might be made by the Court below, notwithstanding the pendency of the appeal in this Court.
Motion denied. [a]
a
Vide new rule of Court of the present term. Ante, Rule XXXII.