Spring v. South Carolina Ins., 6 Wheat. 519 (1821). · Go Syfert
Spring v. South Carolina Ins., 6 Wheat. 519 (1821). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
123 citation events (109 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1901 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1901 1963 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Araujo v. Coachella Valley Water District
S.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sanz v. City of Vallejo
E.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Travis v. Monnier
E.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) King v. C&K Market, Inc.
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Zurich American Ins. Co. of Illinois v. VForce Inc.
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mountjoy v. Bank of America, N.A.
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spine & Neurosurgery Associates v. United Healthcare Ins. Co.
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 19 U.S. 519, 526 (1983). 20 Ultimately, a court may not dismiss a complaint in which the plaintiff has alleged “enough 21 facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 697 (quoting 22 Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570 ).
cited Cited "see" Mtula Tashamby Payton v. Sacramento County
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Zhang v. CA Dept. of State Hospitals
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Smith v. CALPIA
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Forgan v. Tuolumne County Jail
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Bejarano v. Lynch
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Gradford v. Warden
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Hill v. Engelbrektson
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Northcutt v. Sacramento Sheriff's Dept.
E.D. Cal. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Zhang v. CA Dept. of State Hospitals
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Brannigan v. Rhea
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Smith v. Uzma
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Bejarano v. Lynch
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Singh v. CDCR
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Robertson v. Gutierrez
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Hill v. Engelbrektson
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Cano v. Salmonson
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Iseli v. Johnson
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Venable v. Tally
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Trevino v. Sheehan
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Brackett v. Anderson
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Peterson v. Leekie
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Smith v. Calpia
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Edwards v. Corter
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Rodriguez v. Covello
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Taylor v. Cameron
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Brookshire v. Sacramento County Main Jail
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Khademi v. Newsome
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Stanford v. Stashyn
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Barkacs v. Bharat
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PS) Bledsoe v. Zuckerberg
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Luna v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept.
E.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Murillo v. District Attorney Office
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Wheaton v. McComber
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Rodriguez v. Covello
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Cyrus v. Covello
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) O'Brien v. Timms
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Trevino v. Sheehan
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Hood v. Rosen
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Garner v. Hill
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Henderson v. CDCR
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Brown v. Sergent
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Nitkin v. Radu
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" (PC) Barkacs v. Bharat
E.D. Cal. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 19 U.S. 519, 520 (1972) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spring Et Al.
v.
the South Carolina Insurance Company
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 15, 1821.
6 Wheat. 519
Mr. Hunt, for the respondents,, Mr. Wheaton, for: the appellants,
Cited by 121 opinions  |  Published
The Court

denied the motion, but stated that as the object of the respondents was to have the proceeds of the property in litigation, which had been sold by order of the Court below, invested in stocks, such investment might be made by the Court below, notwithstanding the pendency of the appeal in this Court.

Motion denied. [a]

a

Vide new rule of Court of the present term. Ante, Rule XXXII.