In re Tidewater Coal Exch., 296 F. 701 (2d Cir. 1924). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Tidewater Coal Exch., 296 F. 701 (2d Cir. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re TIDEWATER COAL EXCHANGE
No. 252.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 11, 1924.
296 F. 701
Evan Shelby, of New York City (John F. Walker, of New York • City, of counsel), for appellant. 1, James F. Curtis and Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland, all of New York City (Hamilton Rogers,: of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The claim presented is in two parts'. One is called throughout this litigation the coal credit claim, and the other the demurrage claim.

As to the coal credit claim, this court is of opinion that the Director General recovered below quite as much as he was entitled to. As the trustee did not appeal, we express no opinion as to whether any error was committed in arriving at the result appealed from.

The order in respect of the demurrage claim is affirmed on the opinion of Learned Hand, District Judge, in 292 Fed. 225.