green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Washington v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
The Fifth Circuit has held that, “where the failure to disclose relevant evidence if harmless, exclusion is not required by the federal rules.” Caskey v. Man Roland, Inc., 83 F.3d 418, *3 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing Fed.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Casanola v. Delta Machine & Ironworks LLC
Rule 26(e)(1) further obligates all parties to continuously “supplement or correct” their initial disclosures “in a timely manner if [they] learn[] that in some material respect the disclosure . . . is incomplete or incorrect . . . .” The parties are likewise reminded that under Rule 37(c)(1), a party who fails to give information “or identify a witness as required by Rule 26(a) or (e) . . . is not allowed to use that information or witness to supply evidence on a motion, at a hearing, or at trial, unless the failure was substantially justified or is harmless.” See Caskey v. Man Ro…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that 5 “[p]rocedural defects in the agency process are reversible error when the substantial rights of a party have been affected.” McGehee v. Chater, 1996 WL 197435, at *3 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing Maya v. Bowen, 837 F.2d 1362, 1364 (5th Cir.1988)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
Additionally, the Fifth Circuit has held that “procedural defects in the agency process are reversible error when the substantial rights of a party have been affected.” McGehee v. Chater, No. 95-10499, 1996 WL 197435, at *3 (5th Cir. March 21, 1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Colvin
(2×)
See McGehee v. Chater, 83 F.3d 418 , 1996 WL 197435, at *2 (5th Cir.1996) (unpublished table decision) (per curiam) (upholding ALJ’s finding that claimant did not have a medically-determinable mental impairment because it was based upon substantial evidence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGehee
v.
Chater
NO. 95-10499
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Mar 21, 1996
Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:94-CV-604-G
1
AFFIRMED.