green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
All Green Corp v. Wesley
See generally Wohlschlaeger v. Fairmont Hotel Co., 83 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Valentine Foundation v. Uphoff
See Rios v. Hickey, 83 F.3d 419 (5th Cir.1996) (table decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Colvin
See Taylor v. Astrue, 706 F.3d 600, 603 (5th Cir.2012); Hampton v. Bowen, 785 F.2d 1308, 1311 (5th Cir.1986); see also LeBlanc v. Chater, 83 F.3d 419 , 1996 WL 197501, at *3 (5th Cir.1996) (unpublished table decision) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lesvia Barrera
“The district court will not abuse its discretion when it denies a proffered instruction unless this instruction (1) was a correct statement of the law, (2) was not substantially covered in the charge as a whole, and (3) concerned an important point in the trial such that the failure to instruct the jury on the issue seriously impaired the defendant’s ability to present a given defense.” United States v. Jobe, 101 F.3d 1046, 1059 (5th Cir.1996) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Gutierrez-Munoz, 83 F.3d 419 (5th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (district cou…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dacus
v.
Coleman
NO. 95-20439
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Mar 25, 1996
Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CA-H-91-1079
1
REVERSED.