Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n, 340 U.S. 924 (1951). · Go Syfert
Rosecrans v. West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n, 340 U.S. 924 (1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robert Gordon v. Eric Holder, Jr. (cadc, 2013-06-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Robert Gordon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
D.C. Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Consumer Mail Order Association of America v. McGrath, 94 F.Supp. 705, 712 (D.D.C.1950), affd, 340 U.S. 925 , 71 S.Ct. 500 , 95 L.Ed. 668 (1951).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bezzi v. Hocker
10th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co., 10 Cir., 113 F.2d 194 . 8 In determining that title to the reinjected gas was lost because of its fugacious nature and that the gas then became subject to the law of capture, the trial court relied upon West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass'n v. Rosecrans, 204 Okl. 9 , 226 P.2d 965 , appeal dismissed 340 U.S. 924 , 71 S.Ct. 500 , 95 L.Ed. 667 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rosecrans
v.
West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Association
No. 504.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 1951.
340 U.S. 924
John H. Cantrell and B. H. Carey for appellants. David A. Richardson, T. Murray Robinson, Walace Hawkins, Robert W. Richards, Russell G. Lowe, Ralph W. Garrett, Don Emery, Rayburn L. Foster, R. M. Williams, Harry D. Turner and W. H. Brown for appellees.
Are, Black, Noted, Should.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the

want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.