Brooks Transp. Co. v. United States, 344 U.S. 804 (1952). · Go Syfert
Brooks Transp. Co. v. United States, 344 U.S. 804 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bradley v. Saxbe (dcd, 1974-12-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Bradley v. Saxbe
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Assn. of Manufacturers v. McGrath, 103 F.Supp. 510, 512 (D.D.C.), vacated as moot, 344 U.S. 808 , 73 S.Ct. 31 , 97 L.Ed. 627 (1952).
cited Cited "see" Bradley v. Saxbe
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Assn. of Manufacturers v. McGrath, 103 F.Supp. 510, 512 (D.D.C.), vacated as moot, 344 U.S. 808 , 73 S.Ct. 31 , 97 L.Ed. 627 (1952).
cited Cited "see" Delaware River & Bay Authority v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots
N.J. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Detroit v. Division 26 of Amalgamated Ass’n, 332 Mich. 237 , 51 N. W. 2d 228 (Sup. Ct.), appeal dismissed 344 U. S. 805 , 73 S. Ct. 37 , 97 L.
discussed Cited "see" Delaware River and Bay Auth. v. INTERNATIONAL ORG. ETC.
N.J. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Detroit v. Division 26 of Amalgamated Ass'n, 332 Mich. 237 , 51 N.W. 2 d 228 ( Sup. Ct. ), appeal dismissed 344 U.S. 805 , 73 S.Ct. 37 , 97 L.Ed. 627 (1952); City of Cleveland v. Division 268 of Amal.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Robertson (2×)
La. · 1961 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare National Association of Manufacturers of U. S. v. McGrath, D.C., 103 F.Supp. 510 , vacated as moot 344 U.S. 804 , 73 S.Ct. 31 , 97 L.Ed. 627 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brooks Transportation Co., Inc.
v.
United States
No. 190.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1952.
344 U.S. 804
J. Ninian Beall and William M. Blackwell for appellant., Solicitor General Perlman and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Wilmer A. Hill for Falwell Fast Freight, Inc. et al., appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.