green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph W. Janko v. United States
(2×)
See Dillon v. United States, 8 Cir., 218 F.2d 97 , at page 103, certi-orari granted 349 U.S. 914 , 75 S.Ct. 603 , 99 L.Ed. 1248 , and dismissed 350 U.S. 906 , 76 S.Ct. 191 , 100 L.Ed. 796 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Milton D. Hartman v. United States
See Dillon v. United States, 8 Cir., 218 F.2d 97 , certiorari granted 349 U.S. 914 , 75 S.Ct. 603 , 99 L.Ed. 1248 , dismissed 350 U.S. 906 , 76 S.Ct. 191 , 100 L.Ed. *354 796; Berra v. United States, 8 Cir., 221 F.2d 590 , affirmed 351 U.S. 131 , 76 S.Ct. 685 , 100 L.Ed. 1013 ; Achilli v. United States, 77 S.Ct. 995 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allied Stevedoring Corp.
See Dillon v. United States, 8 Cir., 218 F.2d 97 , certiorari granted, 349 U.S. 914 , 75 S.Ct. 603 , 99 L.Ed. 1248 , writ dismissed, 1955, 350 U.S. 906 , 76 S.Ct. 991 ; followed in Berra v. United States, 8 Cir., 1955, 221 F.2d 590 , affirmed, 1956, 351 U.S. 131 , 76 S.Ct. 685 ; United States v. Dodson, Cr.Docket No. C146-82 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rex
Compare United States v. Kin Ping Cheung, 485 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1973), and Carsey v. United States, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 392 F.2d 810 (1967), with Dillon v. United States, 218 F.2d 97 (8th Cir. 1955), cert. granted, 349 U.S. 914 , 75 S.Ct. 603 , 99 L.Ed. 1248 (1955), cert. dismissed, 350 U.S. 906 , 76 S.Ct. 191 , 100 L.Ed. 796 (1955), and United States v. Potash, 118 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1941), cert. den’d., 313 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 1103 , 85 L.Ed. 1540 (1941). ■ The concept of judicial discretion had been most limited when the appellate court has found that the judge’s decision was based …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Incorporated v. Dennis F. Harrup, Lester Blackmon, Beulah F. Viar, John M. Crowder, Jr., and Charles E. Roan
Compare also Steiner v. Mitchell, 6 Cir., 215 F.2d 171 , certiorari granted 349 U.S. 914 , 75 S.Ct. 603 , where workers were held compensable for substantial periods of time consumed in changing clothes and showering required by the hazardous conditions of their employment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bompensiero
v.
Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
v.
Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1955.
Jack Wasserman for petitioner., Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Frank J. Mackin, Assistant Attorney General, and William E. James, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
Published
Application for stay denied.