United States v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., 350 U.S. 927 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co., 350 U.S. 927 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1976 · …the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration. ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
44 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Electronic Industries Association, Consumer Electronics Group v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America (cadc, 1976-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Electronic Industries Association, Consumer Electronics Group v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Lamb Communications, Inc., Liberty Communications, Inc. And Summit Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National Cable Television Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration.
cited Cited "see" B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Dubno
Conn. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Connelly, 142 Conn. 483, 492-93 , 115 A.2d 455 (1955), appeal dismissed, 350 U.S. 927 , 76 S. Ct. 305 , 100 L.
cited Cited "see" W. T. Mayfield Sons Trucking Co. v. United States
N.D. Ga. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Watson Brothers Transportation Company, Inc. v. United States et al., D.C., 132 F.Supp. 905 aff’d per curiam 350 U.S. 927 , 76 S.Ct. 302 , 100 L.Ed. 810 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eagle Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Carl Subler Trucking, Inc., 103 M.C.C. 307, 312 (1966), aff’d, Carl Subler Trucking, Inc. v. United States, 313 F.Supp. 971 (S.D.Ohio 1970). 9 . 358 U.S. at 144-45 , 79 S.Ct. 170 , citing United States v. Watson Brothers Transportation Co., 350 U.S. 927 , 76 S.Ct. 302 , 100 L.Ed. 810 (1956). 10 . 103 M.C.C. at 313 (emphasis added). 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Watson Bros. Transportation Co., Inc.
No. 490.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1956.
350 U.S. 927
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, William J. Lamont, Robert W. Ginnane and Leo H. Pou for appellants. Harold G. Hernly and Beverley S. Simms for appellee.
Douglas, Jurisdiction, Reed, Would.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 88%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judg-

ment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction.