Kraus v. City of Cleveland, 351 U.S. 935 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Kraus v. City of Cleveland, 351 U.S. 935 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Illinois Pure Water Committee, Inc. v. Director of Public Health (ill, 1984-10-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Illinois Pure Water Committee, Inc. v. Director of Public Health
Ill. · 1984 · confidence medium
Ed 1463, 76 S. Ct. 833 .
discussed Cited "see" Mccalden v. California Library Association
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers Union, 45 Cal.2d 784, 789 , 291 P.2d 17, 21 (1955) (defendant invoking impossibility defense required to show affirmatively that performance was impossible or unreasonably expensive despite exercise of skill, diligence and good faith), cert. denied sub nom Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. Oosten, 351 U.S. 937 , 76 S.Ct. 833 , 100 L.Ed. 1464 (1956); see also B.
discussed Cited "see" Mccalden v. California Library Association
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers Union, 45 Cal.2d 784, 789 , 291 P.2d 17, 21 (1955) (defendant invoking impossibility defense required to show affirmatively that performance was impossible or unreasonably expensive despite exercise of skill, diligence and good faith), cert. denied sub nom Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. Oosten, 351 U.S. 937 , 76 S.Ct. 833 , 100 L.Ed. 1464 (1956); see also B.
discussed Cited "see" McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers Union, 45 Cal.2d 784, 789 , 291 P.2d 17, 21 (1955) (defendant invoking impossibility defense required to show affirmatively that performance was impossible or unreasonably expensive despite exercise of skill, diligence and good faith), cert. denied sub nom Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. Oosten, 351 U.S. 937 , 76 S.Ct. 833 , 100 L.Ed. 1464 (1956); see also B.
discussed Cited "see" McCalden v. California Library Ass'n
9th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers Union, 45 Cal.2d 784, 789 , 291 P.2d 17, 21 (1955) (defendant invoking impossibility defense required to show affirmatively that performance was impossible or unreasonably expensive despite exercise of skill, diligence and good faith), cert. denied sub nom Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. Oosten, 351 U.S. 937 , 76 S.Ct. 833 , 100 L.Ed. 1464 (1956); see also B.
discussed Cited "see" Alkire v. Cashman (2×)
S.D. Ohio · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kraus v. City of Cleveland, 163 Ohio St. 559 , 127 N.E.2d 609 , 57 Ohio O. 1 (1955), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 351 U.S. 935 , 76 S.Ct. 833 , 100 L.Ed. 1463 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kraus
v.
City of Cleveland
No. 693.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1956.
351 U.S. 935
Appellant pro se. Joseph H. Crowley for appellees.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file brief of the Christian Science Board of Directors, as amicus curiae, is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.