Fed. Power Comm'n v. Sierra Pac. Power Co., 351 U.S. 946 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Power Comm'n v. Sierra Pac. Power Co., 351 U.S. 946 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we believe that a single district judge may dismiss a complaint if he decides that a substantial constitutional issue is not raised therein.”
52 citation events across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Papakonstantinou Ex Rel. Papakonstantinou v. Civiletti (nyed, 1980-07-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Papakonstantinou Ex Rel. Papakonstantinou v. Civiletti
E.D.N.Y · 1980 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we believe that a single district judge may dismiss a complaint if he decides that a substantial constitutional issue is not raised therein.
cited Cited "see" Siminoff v. Murff
S.D.N.Y. · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wicks v. Southern Pacific Co., 9 Cir., 1956, 231 F.2d 130 , certiorari denied 351 U.S. 946 , 76 S.Ct. 845 , 100 L.Ed. 1471 ; Otten v. Baltimore & O.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Power Commission
v.
Sierra Pacific Power Co. and Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.
No. 51; No. 53.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1956.
351 U.S. 946
Solicitor General Sobeloff and Willard W. Gatchell for petitioner in No. 51. F. T. Searls, Robert E. May and John C. Morrissey for petitioner in No. 53. William C. Chanler for respondent.
Black, Grant, Motion.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)

The respondent’s motion to amend the opinion in this case [350 U. S. 348] is denied without prejudice to the future determination of any issues that may arise as to the right of Sierra to restitution of the excess payments made pursuant to the Commission’s invalid order.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would grant the motion.