green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Musicians Union, Local No. 6 v. Superior Court
“The term ‘employee’ shall include any employee, and shall not be limited to the employees of a particular employer, ...” ( 29 U.S.C.A. §152 (3); see Waxman v. Virginia (1962) 371 U.S. 4 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 50 , 83 S.Ct 46 ], revg. 203 Va. 257 [ 123 S.E.2d 381 ]; N.L.R.B. v. Babcock & Wilcox *709 Co. (1956) 351 U.S. 105, 111-113 [ 100 L.Ed. 975, 982-983 , 76 S.Ct. 697]; Marshall Field & Co. v. N.L.R.B. (7th Cir. 1952) 200 F.2d 375, 379-380 .) Moreover, “ [t]he term ‘labor dispute’ includes any controversy concerning terms, tenure or conditions of employment, or concerning the associatio…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Baltimore Fire Fighters
See, e.g., United States Steel Corp. v. Nichols, 229 F.2d 396, 399-400 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 950 , 76 S.Ct. 846 , 100 L.Ed. 1474 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nichols
v.
United States Steel Corp.
v.
United States Steel Corp.
No. 842.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1956.
Jacob Levin for petitioner. James C. Davis, Laurence E. Oliphant, Jr. and John J. Adams for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.