green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“the power is inherent in the federal courts independently of any statute”
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.
the power is inherent in the federal courts independently of any statute
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kaiser
See Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855 (8th Cir.), cert. den, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Jose Ramirez
See Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855, 863 (8 Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); Hearn v. Rhay, 68 F.R.D. 574, 579 (E.D.Wash. 1975); but see United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6 Cir. 1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Matthew v. United States
See Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Tuolumne Gold Dredging Corp., 137 F.Supp. 855 (N.D.Calif.1953), aff’d, 230 F.2d 479 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 832 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Osborne Owen Fraser, a Witness Before the Special February 1971 Grand Jury v. United States
See Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855 (8th Cir. 1956) certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1936) ; Note, The Rights of a Witness Before a Grand Jury, 1967 Duke L.J. 97 , 107-108. 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wolfson
See Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855, 860 (C.A.8), cert. den. 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic Gear Company v. Borg-Warner Corporation
See Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855, 863 (8 Cir.), cert, denied, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 (1956); Bouschor v. United States, 316 F.2d 451, 458 (8 Cir. 1963); Robinson v. United States, 144 F.2d 392, 405 (6 Cir. 1944), aff’d on other grounds, 324 U.S. 282 , 65 S.Ct. 666 , 89 L.Ed. 944 (1945) ; Tillotson v. Boughner, 350 F.2d 663, 665 (7 Cir. 1965); Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639 (2 Cir. 1962), cert, denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963) (by implication).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roland E. Thompson
(2×)
See Schwimmer v. United States, 232 F.2d 855, 860 (8 Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 ; Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 66 , 26 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed. 652 (1906); Hemans v. United States, 163 F.2d 228 (6 Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 801 , 68 S.Ct. 100 , 92 L.Ed. 380 ; Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323 , 60 S.Ct. 540 , 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Royal G. Bouschor v. United States
Compare Schwimmer v. United States, 8 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 866, 868 , cert. denied 352 U.S. 833 , 77 S.Ct. 48 , 1 L.Ed.2d 52 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walter W. Johnson Co.
v.
Reconstruction Finance Corp.
v.
Reconstruction Finance Corp.
No. 172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
Edwin S. Pillsbury for petitioner. Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.