green
Positive treatment
0.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Lepore v. New York News Inc.
(6×)
But cf. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Home Utilities Co., 234 F.2d 766, 770-771 (4 Cir. 1966), appeal dismissed, 352 U.S. 956 , 77 S.Ct. 349 , 1 L.Ed.2d 363 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Green
See Rules 37, 45(b) and (e), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; compare Gonzalez v. United States, 352 U.S. 978 , 77 S.Ct. 383 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 363 (per curiam), reversing 1 Cir., 233 F.2d 825 , with Heflin v. United States, supra. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Home Utilities Co., Inc.
v.
Eastman Kodak Co.
v.
Eastman Kodak Co.
No. 266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1957.
Melvin J. Sykes for petitioner. David R. Owen for respondent.
Published
Certiorari, 352 U. S. 821, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Dismissed per stipulation pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.