Hitchcock v. Collenberg, 353 U.S. 919 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Hitchcock v. Collenberg, 353 U.S. 919 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Charles D. Stuart v. Will Wilson, Attorney General of the State of Texas (ca5, 1961-08-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Charles D. Stuart v. Will Wilson, Attorney General of the State of Texas
5th Cir. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hitchcock v. Collenberg, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 894 , certiorari denied 353 U.S. 919 , 77 S.Ct. 679 , 1 L.Ed.2d 718 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Beck v. McLeod
E.D.S.C. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Stern & Gressman, Supreme Court Practice (3rd Ed. 1962), p. 164, citing Barton v. Sentner, 353 U.S. 963 , 77 S.Ct. 1047 , 1 L.Ed.2d 901 , where it is noted that “[t]he court is, however, deciding a case on the merits, when it dismisses for want of a substantial question, or affirms summarily.” 5 , Hitchcock v. Collenberg, D.C., 140 F. Supp. 894 , Aff. 353 U.S. 919 , 77 S.Ct. 679 , 1 L.Ed.2d 718 ; Stuart v. Wilson, D.C., 211 F.Supp. 700 , Aff., 371 U.S. 576 , 83 S.Ct. 547 , 9 L.Ed.2d 537 ; Dent v. State of West Virginia, (1889), 129 U. S. 114 , 9 S.Ct. 231 , 32 L.Ed. 623 ; Douglas …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners (2×)
5th Cir. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hitchcock v. Collenberg, D.C.Md.1956, 140 F.Supp. 894 , affirmed per curiam, 1957, 353 U.S. 919 , 77 S.Ct. 679 , 1 L.Ed.2d 718 , citing Dent v. State of West Virginia.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hitchcock
v.
Collenberg
No. 734.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 1957.
353 U.S. 919
John J. O’Connor, Jr. and Charles Orlando Pratt for appellants. C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Taylor v. Oklahoma ex rel. Rutherford, 352 U. S. 805; Dantzler v. Callison, 352 U. S. 939; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114.