green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
The Professional Airline Flight Control Association v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Co., 353 U.S. 927, 927 (1957) (vacating an injunction in a minor dispute “because the dispute [was] not pending before the . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Holland Industries, Inc. v. Division of Transportation of the State
(2×)
See, Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway, 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rutland Railway Corp. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
(2×)
See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River and Indiana Railroad Company, 1957, 353 U.S. 30 , 77 S.Ct. 635 , 1 L.Ed.2d 622 , and Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, 1957, 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 722 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
(2×)
See Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co., 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company v. Brotherhood Of Locomotive Firemen And Enginemen
(2×)
See Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co., 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 11 See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. New York Central Railroad Co., 6 Cir., 246 F.2d 114 ; Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Order of Railroad Telegraphers, 7 Cir., 264 F.2d 254
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Manion
v.
Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.
v.
Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.
No. 702.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1957.
Ralph M. Jones, Charles B. Blackmar, Russell B. Day and Harold C. Heiss for petitioners. Horace F. Blackwell, Jr. for respondent.
Cited by 33 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Kansas City Court of Appeals of Missouri must be vacated in the light of our decision in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana R. Co., 353 U. S. 30, because the dispute here is not pending before the National Railroad Adjustment Board. The cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision and without prejudice to the power of the Court of Appeals to reinstate its judgment if the dispute is submitted to the Adjustment Board by either party within a reasonable time.