Lambert v. California, 353 U.S. 979 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Lambert v. California, 353 U.S. 979 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. John Taylor Queen, Also Known as Jerry Arnold (ca10, 1971-07-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Taylor Queen, Also Known as Jerry Arnold
10th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burns v. United States, 10 Cir., 286 F.2d 152, 157 , and Hayes v. United States, 10 Cir., 238 F.2d 318, 321 , cert. denied 353 U.S. 983 , 77 S.Ct. 1280 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1142 .
discussed Cited "see" Sibyl Herrington v. United States
10th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hayes v. United States, 227 F.2d 540 (10th Cir. 1955), appeal after remand, 238 F.2d 318 (10th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 983 , 77 S.Ct. 1280 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1142 (1957), and Turner v. United States, 222 F.2d 926, 933 (4th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 831 , 76 S.Ct. 65 , 100 L.Ed. 742 (1955).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Troy v. Post, Jr. v. United States of America, Bill M. Allen v. United States of America, Leroy W. Pickett v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hayes v. United States, 227 F.2d 540, 543 (10th Cir. 1955), cert. denied 353 U.S. 983 , 77 S.Ct. 1280 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 1142 (1957). . 2 J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lambert
v.
California
No. 590.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1957.
353 U.S. 979
Samuel C. McMorris for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.
Published

Appeal from the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of. California, Los Angeles County. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 352 U. S. 914.) Argued April 3, 1957. This case is restored to the docket for reargument. The Attorney General of California is invited to file a brief and to participate in the oral argument, the appellee’s time to be equally divided.