Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp., 354 U.S. 917 (1957).

Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp., 354 U.S. 917 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.5 score

13 citation events across 5 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 12

Compared "cf." 1

Treatment by court

alaska	0R/0Y/0G	4
ca10	0R/0Y/0G	4
ca2	0R/0Y/0G	2
ilnd	0R/0Y/0G	2
gand	0R/0Y/0G	1

Frequently cited alongside

#1	green	Sperling	co-cited 4×
#2	cited	Carr	co-cited 3×

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Carr
v.
Beverly Hills Corp.

No. 468.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jun 17, 1957.

354 U.S. 917

77 S. Ct. 1375

1 L. Ed. 2d 1433

1957 U.S. LEXIS 666

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Thomas Dodd Healy and George E. Danielson for petitioner. Paul R. Watkins for the Beverly Hills Corporation, and Frederic H. Sturdy for Lordan et al., respondents.

Ante, Burton, Frankfurter, Harlan, Sperling, Stated, Their, Whittaker.

Cited by 5 opinions | Published

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of Smith v. Sperling, ante, p. 91, decided June 10, 1957, and Swanson v. Traer, ante, p. 114, decided June 10, 1957, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons stated in their dissent in Smith v. Sperling, ante, p. 98.