green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Hale Container Line, Inc.
See NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 257 F.2d 235, 239 (4th Cir.1958) (skilled employee not supervisor where managerial capacity limited to “the control [exercised by] a skilled worker over less capable employees ...”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959). 20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Security Guard Service, Inc.
See NLRB v. Griggs Equipment, Inc., 5 Cir. 1962, 307 F.2d 275, 279 , quoting NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 4 Cir. 1958, 257 F.2d 235, 239 , cert. denied 1959, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BMY—Combat Systems Division of Harsco Corp. v. United States
Id.; see also Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 142 Ct.Cl. 796, 806 , 161 F.Supp. 952 (1958) (referring to the forfeiture statute as “harsh”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 257 F.2d 235, 238 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. de nied, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 575 (1959) (machine printers not supervisors), with NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, George A. Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company, Intervenor. George A. Angle, D/B/A Kansas Refined Helium Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare NLRB v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc., 257 F.2d 235, 238 (4th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 911 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 575 (1959) (machine printers not supervisors), with NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United States
See e. g., Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 161 F.Supp. 952, 958 , 142 Ct.Cl. 796, 806 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959); Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United States, 124 F.Supp. 608, 620 , 129 Ct.Cl. 619, 641 (1954). 39 For the same reasons, a related defense asserted by the Government must likewise fail.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Southern Bleachery & Print Works, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 632.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1959.
Frank A. Constangy, M. A. Prowell and Fred W. Elarbee, Jr. for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott and Dominick L. Manoli for respondent.-
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.